Policy Perspectives is a peer-reviewed, open access, biannual journal with occasional special issues, published by Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) –an Islamabad-based think tank dedicated to promoting policy-oriented research and human development. Established in 1979, the Institute defines Pakistan Affairs, International Relations and Faith and Society as its primary research areas, which are further divided into various sub-themes for focused studies. The Institute’s research spanning over four decades has so far produced over 1500 seminars, conferences and roundtables, around 400 publications, and about 2500 research reports. Policy Perspectives is the flagship journal of the Institute,disseminating the research carried out by IPS and its associates on diverse range of current and evolving topics. The journal reaches out to a large number of individual and institutional researchers, policy makers, key opinion leaders and other stakeholders within the country and across the globe, extending policy-oriented analysis, perspectives and recommendations on issues of national and global significance.

Policy Perspectives is distinctive in combining original research papers with reflective studies and analysis on varied themes and issues. Contributions to the journal appeal to a wide academic and professional readership, and reach an interdisciplinary and international audience. The Journal welcomes original, unpublished scholarly articles from research scholars, experts and policy practitioners. and accepts contributions in the thematic areas of international relations, Pakistan affairs, and faith and society in general, and the topics related to security, society, economy, strategy, governance and foreign policy in particular.

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief: Khalid Rahman

Editor:  Dr Fakhr-ul-Islam

Associate Editors: Syed Nadeem Farhat, Zahida Khalid

Editorial Assistant: Shafaq Sarfaraz

EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD

Dr Aisha Ahmad

Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Centre for South Asian Studies, The Asian Institute; Co-Director of the Islam and Global Affairs Initiative, Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Dr Akis Kalaitzidis

Professor, International Relations and Comparative Politics, School of Social Science and Languages, College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, University of Central Missouri, Warrensburg, USA.

Dr Ivan Safranchuk

Director; Senior Research Fellow, Centre of Central Asia and Afghanistan of the Institute for International Studies, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO) University, Moscow, Russia.

Dr Muhammad Umer Chapra

Advisor, Islamic Research and Training Institute (IRTI), Islamic Development Bank (IDB), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Dr Robert Jensen

Professor Emeritus, School of Journalism, Moody College of Communication, University of Texas, Austin, USA.

Prof. Roger van Zwanenberg,

Managing Director, Pluto Journals, London, UK.

Dr Shahram Akbarzadeh

Research Professor, Middle East & Central Asian Politics, Faculty of Arts and Education, Alfred Deakin Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.

Dr Torkel Brekke

Professor, Cultural and Religious Diversity, Department of International Studies & Interpreting, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Dr Wang Xu

Associate Professor, Executive Director, Department of South Asian Studies, School of Foreign Languages, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Dr Zahid Hussain Bukhari

Executive Director, Center for Islam and Public Policy (CIPP), Washington, DC, USA.

  Policy Perspectives is indexed/abstracted in the following:

• International Political Science Abstracts (IPSA)
• Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals
• Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
• ProQuest
• EBSCO
  • • Political Science Complete Database
    • Social Science Abstracts
• Factiva
• Ovid
• ResearchBib
• JSTOR
• Portico
• Crossref
• Google Scholar
• ResearchBib
• Duotrope
• Journament
• Asianet Pakistan

Last updated on 22 March 2023

Call for Papers

Policy Perspectives is a biannual, open access, peer reviewed Journal published by the Institute of Policy Studies, Islamabad, Pakistan. The digital edition of the Journal is co-published by Pluto Journals, London, UK. The Journal brings forth Pakistani and the Muslim World’s perspectives on issues of national and global significance. The contents of the Journal appeal to a wide academic and professional readership, and reach an interdisciplinary and international audience. Policy Perspectives invites original, unpublished, policy-oriented scholarly articles, book reviews, commentaries from national and international researchers, experts, and policy practitioners. Thematic Areas Policy Perspectives is distinctive in combining original, policy-oriented research papers, reflective studies and analyses on varied issues under its broad themes, namely International Relations, Pakistan Affairs, and Faith and Society. Topics: National and International Security, Defense and Strategic Studies, Public Policy and Governance, Foreign Policy, Issues of the Muslim World, Pakistani Society, Domestic and International Laws; Civilizational Discourses, Maritime Issues, Economy and Environment. The issues related to Pakistan and the Muslim world are preferred. Peer Review & Publication Policy All submissions undergo rigorous Editorial Board review; shortlisted articles are reviewed by the peer reviewers, who are experts within their fields. Policy Perspectives follows double-blind peer review process. Publication in the Journal depends on Board’s positive feedback and reviewers’ recommendation. Timeline for review process may vary from six to twelve weeks depending on reviewers’ availability and responsiveness, and subject to author’s satisfactory revisions. Selected contributions are subjected to editing for reasons of consistency, style, space and clarity. Submissions are accepted on a continuous basis. Submission Guidelines For Articles:

• Abstracts of 200 to 250 words should be shared before submission of manuscript.
• Manuscripts should be in MS Word format.
• Article word count should ideally be around 5000 words including an abstract, key words and endnotes.
• American English should be used.
• Policy Perspectives follows Chicago Manual of Style 16th Edition, Endnotes for references. (For examples, please see detailed guidelines.)

Detailed guidelines can be accessed at: http://www.ips.org.pk/policy-perspectives/#Guidelines-for-Contributors  For Book Reviews:

• Book Reviews of recent books should be approx. 1000 words.

 Submission Procedure: Authors should submit their manuscripts with duly signed undertaking, plagiarism report, brief updated CV while ensuring that guidelines have been followed at the following address:

Email: journal-pp@ips.net.pk

Postal Address: Nasr Chambers, 1, MPCHS Commercial, E-11/3, Islamabad Pakistan

Tel: +92 51 843 8391-3;  +92 51 843 8390

Note: Policy Perspectives follows strict anti-plagiarism policy. ​

Guidelines for Contributors

The Policy Perspectives welcomes original, unpublished, policy-oriented scholarly manuscripts from research scholars, experts and policy practitioners based in Pakistan and other parts of the world. The journal reaches out to a large number of individual and institutional researchers, policymakers, key opinion leaders and other stakeholders within the country and across the globe, extending policy-oriented analysis, perspectives and recommendations on issues of national and global significance.

Submissions should be made using our digital submission system while ensuring that guidelines have been followed. All submissions are screened by the Editorial Board review; shortlisted articles undergo double-blind peer reviews. Publication in the Journal depends on Board’s positive feedback and reviewers’ recommendation.

Submission Process

To submit a manuscript for consideration for publication in the Policy Perspectives click on the “Submit a Manuscript” button on ScienceOpen in the header of the journal landing page. For details, please see guidelines for online submissions.

Word Count: Abstract should be of no more than 150 words, with 5-6 keywords. Total word count of the article should be ideally around 5000 words.

Book Reviews of latest books of around 1000 words can also be submitted.

Submission Timeline

• Upon submitting an article, author/s will receive an acknowledgement of its receipt. After plagiarism check, the article will be evaluated by the Editorial Board for its suitability for the Journal. If selected, it will be sent to two subject experts for double-blind peer review. This process will take three to four months approximately. Timelines of review process may vary depending on reviewer’s availability and responsiveness.
• Reviewers may suggest major or minor revisions, or reject the manuscript for publication. After Editorial Board has made a decision based on reviewers’ recommendations, author/s will be informed.
• In case of major or minor revisions, reviewers’ feedback will be shared with authors. Authors will be required to incorporate the feedback in two to three weeks for reviewer/s to take a second look.
• While resubmitting, author/s should include the revised article in Track Mode along with their responses for the reviewer/s stating how their comments have been incorporated.
• Upon receiving the revised draft, it will be shared with reviewers to see if they are satisfied with the revisions. Due to reviewers’ busy schedule, this process may take one to two months. Final decision will be communicated to author/s.
• If the manuscript has been approved for publication, it will be included in the next issue. Since Policy Perspectives occasionally publishes special issues, approved article may not be published in the earliest issue. Nonetheless, the author/s will be informed and updated at each stage. Although the editorial team aims to expedite the whole process, it can still take up to a year or less between the original submission deadline and final publication.

Spelling and Style Guide

Spellings and punctuation should be used where they are optional in American English (e.g. organize, center, defense). Commas and periods should be given inside closing quotation marks. Single quotation marks are to be used throughout. Longer quotations should be indented and set off from the text, and given in smaller font size, without quotation marks.

Dates should be written as May 20, 2020. Abbreviations should be given in brackets after giving the full form on first use, e.g., United Nations (UN). Subsequently, UN should be used throughout the text.

References

Chicago Manual of Style (CMOS) 16th Edition should be followed for endnotes. Main words in the titles of articles, books and journals should begin with capital letters. Titles of Books, Journals, Newspapers should be italicized. Reports should be cited like books. In case of multiple authors, give the names of all the authors in the endnotes. Examples of citations in CMOS16 are given below:

Books: Syed Irtiqa Ahmed Zaidi, Negotiating the Power Corridors: Forty Challenging Years of Civil Service (Islamabad: IPS Press, 2020).

Chapters in books: Ye Hailin, “Rise of Extremism in India and Chinese Response,” Hindutva: Rising Extremism in India, ed. Khalid Rahman, 2nd ed. (Islamabad: IPS Press, 2020), 117.

Journal articles: Asma Sana Bilal and Nabiya Imran, “Emerging Contours of Transatlantic Relationship under Trump Administration,” Policy Perspectives 16, no. 1 (2019): 3-21 (7) https://doi.org/10.13169/polipers.16.1.0003.

Newspaper articles/websites: Waqar Masood Khan, “Unified Economic Response,” Express Tribune, April 1, 2020, accessed May 12, 2020, https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/637477-.

Diagrams and Tables

Tables, charts, graphs, and figures may be included in the manuscript where necessary with consecutive numbering, proper captions and complete references. These should be in an editable form. Images should be submitted in high resolution (300-600 dpi) in .jpeg and .bitmap. Responsibility to seek permission to reproduce illustrations subject to copyright lies with the author/s.

Copyright

This journal is published under the Creative Commons License CC BY 4.0. This license allows users, scholars and readers, to read the content or any part of the content without charges. This license allows scholars to download and use the contents for educational purposes. This license does not allow the content or any part of the content to be used for commercial purposes.

Submission/Publication Charges

There is no submission fee or publication charges.

“Is the European Union Evolving or Failing?”

Brief Summary Najimdeen Bakare and Tatheer Zahra Sherazi Volume 16, Issue no. 2, Policy Perspectives (2019): 5-25. https://doi.org/10.13169/polipers.16.2.0005 Abstract In recent years, the European Union (EU) has seen and grappled with a varied degree of crisis, which a few observers considered as proof of its vulnerability and at worst scenario – existential threat. As it is with every crisis, there are gainers and losers; there are those who benefit from the fallout and others who manage to turn vulnerability into opportunity and strength. The crisis surrounding the EU can be characterized along the latter context, particularly in the backdrop of rising European populism. The rise of contemporary European populism has raised many questions and generated debates. Based on its anti-EU rhetoric and growing public acceptability, populism is interpreted as EU’s political nemesis. In the midst of rising European populism, the paper looks at the debates in which the EU is considered as a failing or failed project. It also explores the extent to which European populism impacts the European political landscape. The paper explores the notion of populism as an anti-EU movement, bent at dislodging and disintegrating the Union. It argues that the actions of the populist parties suggest otherwise; populist dramatization underscores EU’s continuous evolution and transition instead of its disintegration. Keywords Populism, EU in Transition, EU’s Demise, EU Legitimacy, EU-Exit, Brexit.

“Citizenship Laws of Pakistan: A Critical Review”

Brief Summary Syed Nadeem Farhat Volume 16, Issue no. 2, Policy Perspectives (2019): 59-85 https://doi.org/10.13169/polipers.16.2.0059 Abstract Citizenship is considered a fundamental right that guarantees every other right. Citizenship law of Pakistan was enacted in 1951 and took care of the situations that could presumably arise with respect to this right. The changes in geography, technology and demography as well as the evolution of international law on citizenship during almost seven decades have created certain gaps that may have implications for individuals and their rights might be at stake. Varying interpretations of the courts on certain dimensions of law as well as the failure to introduce the modifications suggested by superior judiciary are among the factors that cause concerns. Along with the Citizenship Act and the law for naturalization, the treatment of foreigners in the country too has certain serious shortcomings that may have severe implications. This paper focuses more on the statutes and their current interpretation. It underscores the significance of the right to citizenship and analyzes various scenarios for acquisition of citizenship, its loss, the status of foreigners and judgements under Pakistani citizenship laws. Keywords Citizenship, Nationality, Migration, Jus Soli, Irregular Immigration.

“Fatwa Institution and Product Development for Islamic Finance in Pakistan”

Brief Summary Ghazala Ghalib Khan and Atiq-uz-Zafar Volume 16, Issue no. 2, Policy Perspectives (2019): 107-126. https://doi.org/10.13169/polipers.16.2.0107 Abstract Pakistan, being an Islamic Republic, is constitutionally obliged to eliminate ribā (interest) from its economy. Thus, Islamic Finance (IF) industry was introduced as an alternate to conventional ribā-based system of financial intermediation. However, efforts towards innovative system of IF are not devoid of criticism. Thus, institutions offering IF, are denounced for excessive reliance on stratagems to legalize ribā, misuse of plurality in Islamic legal rules and gross misapplication of the principles of Islamic Law. The pivotal task of determining sharīʻah compatibility of products and services is realized through the institution of fatwa. Hence, the given scenario of industry stipulates critical appraisal of role and protocols of this very institution for product development (PD). This article argues that for consistency of Islamic financial intermediation with sharīʻah, the industry needs to standardize ‘product development procedures’ with greater focus on regulating its fatwa institution. Keywords Fatwa, Islamic Finance, Product Development, Sharīʻah, Ribā.

Policy Perspectives (Volume 22, Issue 1, 2025)

The latest issue of Policy Perspectives presents research, analyses, and discussion on various topics concerning national and international matters from policy experts, academics, and practitioners.

Amid the ongoing war in Gaza, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) appears to share more foundational ties with Iran than with Israel, prompting a comprehensive reassessment of the GCC relations and regional alignments. Employing the prisoner’s dilemma framework, Dr Nora Maher in her paper “Mending Fences in the GCC-Iran Relationship in the Wake of Israel-Gaza War” examines how hardline Gulf states could shift from a punitive stance toward Iran to a collaborative approach, encouraging cooperation over confrontation.  

Author: Dr Nora Maher, Assistant Professor, Political Science, Political Science Department, Faculty of Political Science, Economics and Business Administration, May University, Cairo, Egypt.

https://doi.org/10.13169/polipers.22.1.ra1

The Palestine-Israel ‘game’ is a multitier, intricate, and ever-evolving conflict, shaped by complex geopolitical dynamics. The paper on “Israel-Gaza War: Geopolitics and the Game Theory” evaluates the protracted Israel-Palestine conflict through the lens of game theory,and seeks to lay down the field of play, identify players, discover different angles from which to approach the matter, and bring the reader closer to possible solutions.

Author: Aneela Shahzad, Geopolitical Analyst; Author of the books: Understanding Politics; Geopolitics— From the Other Side; and Geopolitics – Frameworks and Dynamics in a Multipolar World.

https://doi.org/10.13169/polipers.22.1.ra2

Lars Hilse in his paper “Trump’s Five percent NATO Ruse” assesses  President Donald Trump’s demand for North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members to contribute five percent of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), as a strategic business initiative rather than a genuine security policy objective. The paper argues that President Trump’s demand strategically advances American business interests, as the European nations currently allocate approximately 63 percent of their military procurement budgets to US defense firms, yielding a substantial return on minimal US investment in NATO’s actual operational costs. 

Author: Lars Hilse, Independent Researcher, Cyber Security Expert, Bunsoh, Germany.

https://doi.org/10.13169/polipers.22.1.ra3

Historically, the U.S. Indo-Pacific policy has been shaped by efforts to counter China’s expanding political, economic, and military influence. China’s territorial claims in the South China Sea (SCS) and East China Sea (ECS), along with its tensions with Taiwan and US regional allies, have prompted Washington to recalibrate its Indo-Pacific policy and strategic posture. The paper “Evolving US Indo-Pacific Posture and Strategic Competition with China” also analyzes the political, economic and military ramifications of the US Indo-Pacific policy for China including regional alliances, trade and investments, arms race, maritime security, tariffs and duties under Trump 2.0 administration.   

Authors: Abid Hassan, Research Associate, Department of IR, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan; and Syed Hammad Ali, Research Associate, Department of IR, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan

https://doi.org/10.13169/polipers.22.1.ra4

Asifa Tanveer in her paper on “From Ganga to Pahalgam: India’s Arc of Strategic Deceit” evaluates India’s tendency to blame Pakistan for its domestic instabilities, particularly ‘terrorist’ events. She explores the history and use of false flag operations to contextualize India’s pattern of blame provenance in the wake of Pahalgam incident. She further analyzes whether Pahalgam incident and the much-hyped Indian response reflects honest concerns, or a broader political agenda, reflecting ‘method in madness’.

Author: Asifa Tanveer, Associate Editor, Institute of Policy Studies (IPS), Islamabad; Former Chief Officer, Local Government & Community Development Department (LGCDD), Rawalpindi, Pakistan. 

https://doi.org/10.13169/polipers.22.1.ra5

Next, Khalid Rahman in his paper “The Life and Legacy of A Luminary Scholar Khurshid Ahmad (1932-2025): A Tribute” pays homage to Prof. Khurshid Ahmad, the founder and patron of the Policy Perspectives, exploring his contributions. Khurshid Ahmad was not only a prominent Pakistani figure and global thought leader, but also a staunch ambassador of Islamic thought, Pakistan and the Muslim Ummah, earning him widespread respect, even from across ideological and political divides. His writings and initiatives, which explain the distinction between Islamic economics, socialism, and capitalism, helped shape modern Islamic economic theory, he argues.

Author: Khalid Rahman, Chairman, Institute of Policy Studies (IPS), Islamabad, Pakistan

https://doi.org/10.13169/polipers.21.2.ra6

Finally, the ‘Dialogue at IPS’ section features  discussions  of events held at the Institute of Policy Studies on a number of significant subjects related to national, regional and global affairs during recent months along with a summary of situational briefs on ‘Beyond the Frontlines: 50 Days since Pahalgam Incident’.

The full text of the articles is available at ScienceOpen.

Editorial Office: journal-pp@ips.net.pk